More on Epidemiology and the Public's Health
A recent article in the New York Times Magazine profiles the case of hormone replacement therapy as an example of the seemingly endless yo-yo cycle of medical research findings, and discusses whether or not we know what really makes us healthy. It's treatment of epidemiology is informed if a little focused on the negative.
clipped from www.nytimes.com While the tools of epidemiology — comparisons of populations with and without a disease — have proved effective over the centuries in establishing that a disease like cholera is caused by contaminated water, as the British physician John Snow demonstrated in the 1850s, it’s a much more complicated endeavor when those same tools are employed to elucidate the more subtle causes of chronic disease. |
Labels: epidemiology, research
4 Comments:
Epidemiologists are paid by the p-value. They have figured out how to get p-values less than 0.05. Just test a lot of things.
oooooh, them's fightin' words.
Who cares what the p value is if no one will act on it? I am so sick of research being done by dimwits while researchers (like lil ol' me) can't get a decent job! I have been mightily pissed off for years now... Dear julep- are you getting a good job done while doing your degree?
Hmm. God knows I try.
Post a Comment
<< Home